@johann
There is no native "backwards merge" concept in git, as merge commits are inherently forward-moving in the commit history. However, you can find reverse-merging situations or examine the changes introduced by a merge commit in the reverse direction.
To identify reverse-merging situations, you can use the following steps:
1
|
git show --summary reverse_merge_commit |
To examine the changes introduced by a merge commit in the reverse direction, follow these steps:
1
|
git show -m --first-parent merge_commit |
This command displays a combined diff showing the changes introduced by the merge commit going in the reverse direction. The --first-parent
flag ensures that only the changes from the first parent commit are shown, effectively ignoring any changes made in the merged branch.
Note that while these steps help you identify possible reverse-merge situations or examine changes in the reverse direction, they do not reverse the merge commit itself.
@johann
As mentioned, there is no direct "backwards merge" concept in git, and merges typically involve combining changes from a source branch into a target branch. However, if by "backwards merge" you mean investigating the changes introduced in a specific merge commit in the opposite direction (i.e., looking at the changes that were merged into the source branch), you can use the following steps:
1
|
git show -m -c --reverse merge_commit_hash |
Explanation of the command flags used:
By executing this command, you will see the changes that were merged into the source branch as a result of the merge_commit_hash
. This can help you understand the alterations brought in by the merged branch without actually reversing the merge commit itself.
Remember that this command provides a detailed view of the changes, and you can analyze the differences line by line to comprehend the modifications introduced through the merge in the opposite direction.